Tag Archives: integrating research in the curriculum

Using Exhibitions for Undergraduate Scholarship

By Ian F. MacInnes, Alexa Sand, and Lisandra Estevez

Curating exhibitions is genuine research work that allows students to work collaboratively, engage the community, and practice public humanities scholarship. Exhibitions can teach students the fundamentals of research in a discipline while focusing on small and achievable outcomes, like bibliographic descriptions and short interpretive explanations. Exhibitions can help students understand and articulate the value of the public humanities. They allow students to practice making a persuasive visual and textual argument for a general audience. And finally, working on an exhibition is inherently collaborative, a model of humanities scholarship that is becoming more prevalent. Planning and mounting exhibitions can be resource and time intensive, but students tend to embrace the challenge. The public venue inspires them to do their best work.

An exhibition itself may be real or virtual, though whenever possible your students should have access to the actual objects they will be curating. Here are some things to be aware of if you are considering adding an exhibition project to your class.

Be open to different sources of material

The material for your exhibition is an opportunity to think creatively about the collaborative work you envision. Libraries and museums are obvious sources (and venues), but so are local historical societies. Smaller museums and libraries often have interesting collections of uncurated material, giving students an even more meaningful experience. Libraries also often have unadvertised collections of objects that can supplement documents. If local archives don’t have what you need, it is sometimes surprisingly easy to collect items yourself. Major auction sites, like eBay, are inexpensive sources of fragmentary material. Roman glass, Greek pottery sherds, pages from early print sources, and modern ephemera are all probably within reach of your budget. Finally, don’t forget that students can create facsimiles and replicas to build out an exhibition, either working on their own or with the help of experts on campus.

Prepare the ground with your collaborators

Whether working with a departmental or college gallery space, a campus museum, your library, or another on- or off-campus venue, start discussions long in advance of the first class meeting. Think about scheduling: when will the exhibition be installed or beta-tested? When will it open and will there be an associated event? When will it close and who will be responsible for taking it down and cleaning up? Are there special considerations to be taken into account in handling materials or working in the space, or the digital environment? Who will be responsible for what aspects of student support? For example, if display “furniture” such as supports or hanging hardware need to be constructed or installed, will the students do this, or will it be delegated to a preparator, and if so, is the service gratis, or fee based?

It’s a good idea to have all of this worked out ahead of time. That way, you can give student curators a comprehensive “map” of what their responsibilities will be, and what support they can expect from staff or curators employed by the exhibition venue.

Scaffold the needed skills into the class material

Exhibitions are daunting assignments from a student’s perspective, so it’s extra important to build student skills slowly from a base. Scaffolding, along with clear benchmarks, gives students a better sense of direction of where to start with this project. It is especially important in working with students who might have little experience with research in our disciplines.

Some early steps include

More complex later steps include

  • Interpretive descriptions;
  • Transcription and translation;
  • Introductory explanation for the entire exhibition;
  • An exhibition catalog;
  • Posters advertising exhibition; and
  • Oral script of presentations for exhibition opening.

While scaffolding undergraduate research assignments might seem time-consuming, it actually allows for better time management for both students and instructors. By providing clear goals from the start, students get ongoing feedback regarding the progress of their project. Scaffolding also helps to model the research process for students step-by-step. They begin with a question, transform it into a statement or thesis, and carry out research for a bibliography. They then produce a substantial, thoughtful project that can be shared with the academic community.

Remember you are part of the team

As instructor, you are responsible for evaluating and assessing student work associated with the exhibition, but don’t forget that your name will also be publicly associated with the results. This means that you should consider yourself part of the team as well as an outside judge. While you normally avoid editing students’ work for excellent pedagogical reasons, you should not be shy about revising material that will be made public. Doing so not only helps create a better outcome but lets your students know that you are willing to work alongside them on a successful event.

Know your tools

Mounting an exhibition, whether actual or virtual, requires technical skills. As for most pedagogy, don’t evaluate your students on skills you don’t have yourself, including digital skills. And try to stick with exhibitions you feel confident about mounting yourself if you had to. Having a committed collaborator is often helpful, but don’t expect your IT department or your archivist to fill in for skills you lack.

Leave time for installation

It is tempting to think that final installation will go quickly since it’s just a physical event. But installations, whether physical or digital, take time, care, and can run into obstacles that may require time to fix. If you expect students to include replicas, make sure you plan for the time, space, materials, and expertise to help them achieve these goals. When possible, set aside some class time for installation. It’s practically the only time you can actually require all students to be present.

Plan your publicity

The more public your exhibition, the more your students will be inspired to do their best. Make publicity part of the project. Consider setting aside time and money for a “grand opening” event that includes campus stakeholders and influencers. As Chip and Dan Heath reveal in The Power of Moments, celebratory milestones can give students a sense of achievement and closure. And dissemination is a key element of undergraduate research: students should have the opportunity to interact with public visitors to their exhibition.

Further reading

Several models for curatorial work are discussed in this CUR Quarterly essay by Alexa Sand, Becky Thoms, Darcy Pumphrey, Erin Davis, and Joyce Kinkead of Utah State University, where the university’s library and art museum have often been the venues for student curatorial projects, and where the expertise of the library and museum staff are a critical factor.

Furthermore, a couple of great resources for composing museum labels and texts and creating inclusive exhibitions can be found here.

A comprehensive source for labels:

Serrell, Beverly. Exhibit Labels: An Interpretive Approach. Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.

Didactics:

Writing Text and Labels (Australian Museum)

The V&A Ten Point Guide to Gallery Text

Quick Guide to Adult Audience Interpretive Materials (The J. Paul Getty Museum)

The Inclusive Museum

Cognitive underpinnings:

Heath, Chip and Dan, The Power of Moments: Why Certain Experiences Have Extraordinary Impact . Simon & Schuster, 2017.

Check out our other best-practice guides for faculty:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Lessons for the Arts and Humanities from CUR’s New Book on Mentoring

The latest book from CUR is Excellence in Mentoring Undergraduate Research, edited by Maureen Vandermaas-Peeler, Paul C. Miller, and Jessie L. Moore. The volume offers both advice (to mentors and institutions) and information about the latest trends in mentoring. The biggest overall argument of the book is that we need to find ways to “scale access to high-quality mentored UR within institutions,” bundling and scaffolding opportunities within the curriculum (217). Given this goal, the book is clearly aimed at a wide audience, but there are some key lessons for faculty in the arts and humanities.

Sections specific to the arts and humanities

As you might expect, the arguments drawn from surveys are less specifically useful to the arts and humanities because STEM projects still dominate undergraduate research. In one survey mentioned, for example, only 6.1% of the respondents were in humanities and arts (23). But five of the volume’s 27 contributors are in the arts and humanities: one artist (Dijana Ihas), three English/writing faculty (Jane Greer, Jessie Moore, and Michael Neal), and CURAH’s own Jenny Olin Shanahan. Their experiences come through in case studies and in specific recommendations. One special section, by music professor Dijana Ihas, is specifically devoted to “mentoring research in the arts” (138-142). Later, in the chapter on integrating research into the curriculum, there appears a short program-level case study of the English curriculum at St. Mary’s University of Minnesota (189-190).

Trending topics

  • Including underrepresented students in undergraduate research
  • Integrating research into the curriculum
  • Co-mentoring
  • Faculty development

If you can only read one chapter, what should it be?

  • For individual faculty mentors: Chapter 4: “10 Salient Practices for Mentoring,” by Helen Walkington, Eric E. Hall, Jenny Olin Shanahan, Elizabeth Ackley, and Kearsley Stewart
  • For anyone involved in curriculum development: Chapter 7: “Undergraduate Research in the Curriculum and as Pedagogy” by Brad Wuetherick, John Willison, and Jenny Olin Shanahan.
  • For administrators: Chapter 5: “Supporting Faculty Development for Mentoring in Undergraduate Research, Scholarship, and Creative Work,” by Vicki L. Baker, Jane Greer, Laura G. Lunsford, Dijana Ihas, and Meghan J. Pifer.

Where can I get this book?

Excellence in Mentoring Undergraduate Research is currently available only from CUR’s bookstore, with an ebook available from Google Play.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Materials Matter: Humanities and STEM Work together in Innovative Program

Because human culture has a material element, the material world offers an important connection between the arts and humanities and STEM fields. This connection fuels Binghamton University’s new transdisciplinary research group: Material and Visual Worlds. Materials are part of everyday life, yet their physical properties, social histories, and conditions of formation are opaque to most of us. And academics rarely study these varied aspects of materials in concert. With support of a Humanities Connections grant from the National Endowment of the Humanities, we at Binghamton are creating a suite of undergraduate research and general education courses to connect the humanities with STEM fields focused on materials.

The project

Our team includes a cultural anthropologist, a classical archeologist, a graphic designer, a physicist, an engineer, and me (as Director of Undergraduate Research and an interdisciplinary scholar). We are creating spaces where students can consider innovations in the development and use of materials as products not only of elemental processes and scientific experimentation but also of human needs and desires, and of historical forces.  

After one year of planning, we developed a pilot course, Materials Matter, that was team taught in Spring 2018 by a humanist (Roman archeologist Hilary Becker) and a scientist (physicist Todd Rutkowski). The course focused on one material: pigments. It taught foundational concepts of the physics of light and color and technical methods of analysis, as well as analytic methodologies of the humanities. These methods included interpretations of textual and artifactual evidence, and theorized understandings of relationships between people and the material assemblages with which they are enmeshed. Students applied scientific tools like X-ray fluorescence to the study of pigments used in ancient and modern times. They also practiced techniques of fresco painting and mixing pigments with different binders by hand, comparing their characteristics. Later, they visited our project partner, Golden Artists Paints in New Berlin, New York, and learned how scientists and artists work together to develop new paint formulations. Their experiences reveal how transdisciplinary study is not just a luxury of the academy but also a wider key to innovation.

Challenges

While students loved our pilot course, we are still refining our approach. From the outset, we wanted to have students analyze glass and ceramic materials as well as pigments. We also want to scale up the 20 seat seminar to a large lecture hall style sectionalized course to provide more students with this experience. But we don’t want to sacrifice the experiential nature of the course activities or the assignments that allow students to formulate and investigate their own questions. An undertaking of this scale has taken a massive orchestration, and our university structures don’t always make it easy. For example, how do we support the instructional expertise we need to teach science and humanities rigorously in one course? How do we support TAs from each area to lead discussion sections and labs? And how do we catalogue such an integrated course in our bulletin?

Development

Dr. Pamela Smart, my colleague on this project, has led the second iteration of Materials Matter. For the first time at Binghamton, we have created a course designated as both laboratory science and aesthetics general education. To support the course, we have assigned one TA from art history and one from chemistry to lead separate sections. Using our NEH award, we hired a a post-doctoral student to formulate and test each lab exercise. We’ll also be inviting guest lecturers to contribute their expertise. Golden Artists Colors will again contribute to the course, and we are bringing in our second industry partner, Corning Museum of Glass. Students will work on a lab custom designed by their chief scientist Jane Cook and curator Marvin Bolt, and then take a field trip to the museum. We will also carefully assess our course through pre- and post-course surveys and focus groups of students and faculty.

Future plans

Ultimately, we want to show undergraduates how to combine research techniques and perspectives from the humanities with those of the sciences. The next planned course will be a first-year research immersion experience, a two-course sequence that will be part of Binghamton’s new initiative, the Source Project. This initiative teaches first-year students how to do research in humanities and social sciences. It also offers courses like Materials Matter which bring these fields into mutually enhancing conversation with STEM fields. For example, a first-year student from the Spring 2018 course chose to ask why red ochre was used as an adulterant with cinnabar in wall paintings in Roman villas. He answered the question by considering cinnabar’s chemical as well as economic properties. Asked to reflect on his experience doing this work he concludes, “By combining the humanities and sciences, I was able to ask unique questions, go further in-depth, and expand more than I would have been able to otherwise. The humanities and sciences need each other in order to tell a complete story.”

Implications

The challenges we face in integrating STEM and humanities have implications not only for teaching and learning but also for the ways we go about organizing research. Over the past two years we have seen how the intellectual labor of our team has spurred new relationships and integrative research projects for faculty and staff. And we are pleased that our first doctoral student assistant received a post-doc position to work on a new interdisciplinary curriculum at another public university. This project has deepened our conviction that the most compelling and productive way to foster a liberal education is through integrative, experiential coursework that goes beyond the boundaries of any one discipline. If you’d like to hear more, we will be presenting our work in a panel at the AAC&U annual conference later this month with other like-minded colleagues creating similar experimental courses at their institutions.